Abstract / Description
Objective for CSSP-2018-CP-2366
Our objective is to develop a consensus-based, evidence-informed national Standard on First Responder Workplace Fatigue Risk Management that will provide an approach to systematically prevent and manage workplace fatigue by addressing it in a strategic, coordinated approach, and as part of a broad organizational management framework.
How this milestone supports the objective for CSSP-2018-CP-2366
This milestone will contribute to the development of a Seeds Document that will be used to develop a national Standard, in accordance with CSA Groups’ accredited standards development process. This report describes the “Research and Synthesis of Evidence” phase, specifically a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to provide current state-of-the-art scientific knowledge in first responder workplace fatigue risk management. The objective of this scoping review was to broadly identify relevant research pertaining to fatigue risk management and synthesize the research to inform aspects of risk management model known as the RACE model (recognize hazards, assess risks, implement controls, and evaluate effectiveness of controls) that will be integrated into a broader management system framework using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).
Background
First responders are at high risk of suffering from decrements in neurocognitive and physical performance related to fatigue. Such performance decrements endanger not only the personal health and safety of these responders but also the health and safety of their fellow responders and the public they serve. Fatigue may also be a precursor to adverse longer-term outcomes, such as musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular disease, and mental health disorders. Appropriate management, policymaking, standards, guidance, and research activities can reduce the exposure to these fatigue-related risks and hazards before they pose significant problems during emergency response operations.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review to examine the extent, range, and nature of research activity, allowing us to identify gaps in the current literature. A scoping review consists of five stages: 1) identifying the pertinent research question(s), 2) searching the relevant studies, 3) selecting studies, 4) charting the data, 5) summarizing and reporting the results. Due to the multifaceted nature of fatigue, we adopted an integrative approach focusing on cognitive fatigue (i.e., sleepiness, arousal, attention, cognitive overload/underload), physical fatigue (i.e., muscular fatigue, central/peripheral fatigue), perceptual fatigue (i.e., visual fatigue), emotional fatigue (i.e., compassion fatigue), and burnout. We were guided by the following questions:
- In EMS, Firefighting, and Law Enforcement, how are hazards of fatigue identified?
- In EMS, Firefighting, and Law Enforcement, how do organizations and personnel assess the risk of fatigue?
- In EMS, Firefighting and Law Enforcement, what control actions or interventions are available to reduce fatigue?
- In EMS, Firefighting and Law Enforcement, what are valid and reliable instruments for measuring or detecting fatigue among personnel?
General Findings
Our comprehensive literature search strategy resulted in a total of 403 relevant articles that met our inclusion criteria. We found that the focus on the type of fatigue differed between the three first responder occupations; the distribution of papers based on risk factor sub-categories and interventions also differed between occupations.
- 38.7% focused on firefighting, 33.3% on police, and 22.8% on EMS work, 5.2% of articles focused on a combination of the three occupations.
- Cognitive fatigue most represented in EMS research (45 articles) and Police research (88 articles).
- Physical fatigue most represented in firefighting research (116 articles).
- Personal/social/cultural (20 articles) and work organization (17 articles) fatigue risk factors were frequently cited in EMS research. Work organization (47 articles) and personal/social/cultural (36 articles) risk factors were common in police research. There was a consistent distribution of articles representing all four risk factor sub-categories in firefighting research.
- We identified potential fatigue-related outcomes into three outcome sub-categories. In both firefighting and police, physical health were most frequently identified. There was a consistent distribution of the number of articles among outcome sub-categories in EMS research.
- The primary type of intervention or risk control strategy in EMS research was engineered solutions (7 articles). In firefighting, 18 articles focused on PPE and 17 articles on engineered solutions. In police research, the most frequently cited intervention was training (12 articles).
Fatigue Measurement & Risk Assessment Tools
Tools ranged from self-reported instruments and surveys to objective measures. The Maslach Burnout Inventory was the primary tool of choice when measuring burnout; Schaufeli et al.’s (2001) study recommends using both the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Malach-Pines Burnout Measure to balance both sensitivity and specificity. Surveys instruments were common to measure cognitive fatigue, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire; however, there is a lack of information on the sensitivity and specificity of these instruments. Objective measures of cognitive fatigue including heart rate, critical flicker fusion frequency, psychomotor vigilance task, oculomotor behaviour, polysomnography, and actigraphy have all been employed. These measures remain elusive in large-scale studies due to cost, practicality, and efficiency. Physical fatigue measures include heart rate as an index of physiological strain and metabolic rate, Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) as a psychophysical scale for physical strain, and observational risk assessment tools to assess musculoskeletal disorder risk. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of these tools.
Fatigue & Outcome Relationships in First Responder Occupations
We identified 22 papers that linked risk factors, fatigue type, and outcome. Cognitive fatigue was cited as the most acknowledged type of fatigue linked to health (injury, accident risk, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular disease), wellness (depression, anxiety, dissatisfaction), and work performance. Increasing fatigue generally led to adverse outcomes, however 15 of the retained articles were cross-sectional studies, limiting our interpretation of causality.
Fatigue Management Interventions Identified in First Responder Occupations
We identified interventions and controls based on the Hierarchy of Controls (NIOSH, 2015). In all three occupations, training was the most common type of intervention to mitigate burnout. PPE and engineering controls were most common in combating physical fatigue. There was a stronger focus on administrative and training controls to reduce cognitive fatigue. No single intervention was supported by overwhelming evidence, but we found limited support for stretcher design, predictive capacity testing, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) design (material and shape), and mindfulness-based resilience training. Articles indicate that changes to protective clothing, to reduce physical demands and fatigue, were not effective solutions in firefighting work.
Conclusion
The scoping review provides insight towards the extent, impact, and management of fatigue based on a broad range of fatigue types for first responder occupations. Categorizing by fatigue type might be useful in targeting appropriate controls and focus future research investigations. In all three occupations, burnout, cognitive fatigue, and physical fatigue were associated with adverse health and performance effects; these results highlight the importance of managing fatigue, of any type, to prevent longer term outcomes. Although a range of measurement tools have been identified in the peer-reviewed literature, future investigations are needed to identify tools specific to first responder occupations and information on the sensitivity and specificity of these instruments. No single interventions were supported by overwhelming evidence; high quality research, including randomized control trials, may help identify and inform effective risk mitigation strategies for first responders.